Sentiment Analysis Before Presidential Election 2024 Using Naïve Bayes Classifier Based On Public Opinion In Twitter Analisa Sentimen Jelang Pilpres 2024 Menggunakan Naïve Bayes Classifier Berdasarkan Opini Publik Di Twitter

Main Article Content

Heri Prasetyo
Arif Senja Fitrani

Abstract

This study aims to determine the performance of the Naïve Bayes Classifier algorithm and sentiment analysis tested on a dataset obtained from Twitter social media scrapping with the topic of 2024 presidential candidates. Three candidates frequently discussed in public spaces were used as keyword parameters in data mining: #anis, #ganjar, and #pilpres2024, resulting in 3021 tweets extracted from 12/1/2022 to 31/1/2023, which were successfully converted to ".csv" format documents. Public opinions extracted from the dataset were then pre-processed using the Python programming language, resulting in 2157 cleaned tweets. The data that passed the pre-processing stage was then labeled as positive or negative sentiment. Sentiment analysis was performed using the Naïve Bayes Classifier algorithm with three testing experiments using different training and testing data compositions in each experiment. The results of the study showed that the best Naïve Bayes model was obtained in the first experiment with a 10% testing data and 90% training data composition, resulting in 71% accuracy, 93% precision, 66% recall, and an f-measure score of 77%. The conclusion of the study is that the electability of the 2024 presidential candidates shapes public opinion and generates public sentiment in the form of positive and negative tweets. Positive tweets had a higher percentage of 71.5% (1543), while negative sentiment tweets accounted for 28.5% (614). Further research is expected to produce different information by using different classification algorithms and larger data sets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
H. Prasetyo and A. S. Fitrani, “Sentiment Analysis Before Presidential Election 2024 Using Naïve Bayes Classifier Based On Public Opinion In Twitter”, PELS, vol. 4, Jul. 2023.
Section
Computer Science

References

[1] M. A. Firmansyah, D. Mulyana, S. Karlinah, and S. Sumartias, “Kontestasi Pesan Politik dalam Kampanye Pilpres 2014 di Twitter: Dari Kultwit Hingga Twitwar,” JIK, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 42, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.31315/jik.v16i1.2681.
[2] A. Septiana, “Analisis Fungsi Partai Politik Pada Pilkada Musi Banyuasin 2017 (Studi Terhadap Partai Politik Pengusung Pasangan Dodi Reza Dan Beni Hernedi),” jssp, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–41, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.19109/jssp.v3i1.4066.
[3] S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts, “Who says what to whom on twitter,” in Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, Hyderabad India: ACM, Mar. 2011, pp. 705–714. doi: 10.1145/1963405.1963504.
[4] P. Patmawati and M. Yusuf, “Analisis Topik Modelling Terhadap Penggunaan Sosial Media Twitter oleh Pejabat Negara,” bits, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 122–129, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i3.1012.
[5] I. W. D. Gafatia and N. Hadinata, “Analisis Pro Kontra Vaksin Covid 19 Menggunakan Sentiment Analysis Sumber Media Sosial Twitter,” JPSII, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 34–42, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.47747/jpsii.v2i1.544.
[6] M. D. Devika, C. Sunitha, and A. Ganesh, “Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study on Different Approaches,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 87, pp. 44–49, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.124.
[7] I. Kurniawan and A. Susanto, “Implementasi Metode K-Means dan Naïve Bayes Classifier untuk Analisis Sentimen Pemilihan Presiden (Pilpres) 2019,” Jurnal Eksplora Informatika, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.30864/eksplora.v9i1.237.
[8] E. I. Saptanti, “Analisis Manajemen Impresi Ma’ruf Amin dalam Debat Pilpres 2019,” ULTIMA Comm, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 262–284, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.31937/ultimacomm.v12i2.1573.
[9] Y. Sahria, “Implementasi Teknik Web Scraping pada Jurnal SINTA Untuk Analisis Topik Penelitian Kesehatan Indonesia,” 2020.
[10] N. L. P. M. Putu, Ahmad Zuli Amrullah, and Ismarmiaty, “Analisis Sentimen dan Pemodelan Topik Pariwisata Lombok Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Bayes dan Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” RESTI, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 123–131, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.29207/resti.v5i1.2587.
[11] H. Annur, “Klasifikasi Masyarakat Miskin Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 160–165, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v10i2.303.160-165.
[12] D. T. Anggraeni, “FORECASTING HARGA SAHAM MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGE DAN WEB SCRAPPING,” jurnalmatrik, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 234–241, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.33557/jurnalmatrik.v21i3.726.
[13] D. Gunawan, “Metode Klasifikasi pada Data Preprocessing Data,” no. 1, 2016.
[14] D. Darwis, E. S. Pratiwi, and A. F. O. Pasaribu, “PENERAPAN ALGORITMA SVM UNTUK ANALISIS SENTIMEN PADA DATA TWITTER KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA,” Edutic, vol. 7, no. 1, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.21107/edutic.v7i1.8779.
[15] S. Raschka, “Naive Bayes and Text Classification I - Introduction and Theory.” arXiv, Feb. 14, 2017. Accessed: May 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5329

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>