Productivity Analysis Using Pospac Method And Performance Prism At Pt Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Pospac Dan Performance Prism Di Pt Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
PT. PCS is an industry that supplies organic fertilizer products. In production activities at PT. PCS only
calculates productivity from the efficiency of raw material costs, fuel cost efficiency, and profit from sales. And the
performance measurement system at PT. PCS has not displayed optimal industrial performance, from company
leaders, employees or workers, to suppliers or suppliers. With these problems, it is necessary to measure and improve
to minimize the decline in productivity, and also to improve the performance of the company's stakeholders at PT.
PCS. To find out which month the dominant increase and decrease from the results of the level and productivity index
can use the POSPAC method and use the performance prism method to analyze the company's performance for each
stakeholder. With this, it can determine the weight of the smallest value of the measurement specification based on
the POSPAC indicator of the achievement of KPIs. From the results of the study, it can be seen that the increase in
the results of the level and productivity index in 2019-2020 was dominant in August, while for the decline in the results
of the level and productivity index in 2019-2020, it was dominant in October and November. Meanwhile, from the
results obtained in the elaboration of measurement specifications based on POSPAC indicators from KPI
achievements, including the percentage of workers who are satisfied and comfortable with the work environment, the
percentage of estimated time to find the cause of the problem, the percentage of product shortages and excess stock,
the level of employee ability, the percentage of complaints bill payments. With these problems from the PT.
Petrokopindo Cipta Selaras can implement a productivity measurement system using the POSPAC method, and
evaluate each performance indicator with a performance prism on a regular basis.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
hypogaea L). Jurnal Pijar MIPA. Vol. 13, No. 2, Hal. 137-139.
[2] Yuniarti, A. Maya D. Dina M N. 2019. Efek Pupuk Organik Dan Pupuk N,P,K Terhadap C-Organik, N-Total,
C/N, Serapan N, Serta Hasil Padi Hitam Pada Inceptisols. Jurnal Pertanian Presisi. Vol. 3, No. 2, Hal. 90-105.
[3] Lestari, S U. Muryanto. 2018. Analisis Beberapa Unsur Kimia Kompos Azolla Mycrophylla. Jurnal Ilmiah
Pertanian. Vol. 14, No. 2, Hal. 60-65.
[4] Katarina. Firmansyah K. 2021. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja
Karyawan Pada Cv. Makmur Jaya Abadi (Mja) Kota Bima. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian. Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal. 199-
204.
[5] Aprilyanti, S. 2017. Pengaruh Usia dan Masa Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja (Studi Kasus: PT. OASIS
Water International Cabang Palembang). Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri. Vol. 1, No. 2, Hal. 68-72.
[6] Purnomo, H. 2004. Pengantar Teknik Industri. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[7] Mauluddin, Y. Mira E A. 2017. Penyusunan Skenario Untuk Mempertahankan Produktivitas Perusahaan
Menghadapi Penetapan Upah Minimum Kabupaten (UMK) Di Kabupaten Garut (Studi Kasus di Perusahaan
Tempe Lingkar Jaya). Jurnal Kalibrasi. Vol. 15, No. 1, Hal. 22-28.
[8] Prabowo, R. Rizal A. 2020. Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Pospac Dan Performance Prism
Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja (Studi Kasus: Industri Baja Tulangan di PT. X Surabaya). Jurnal Rekayasa
Sistem Industri. Vol. 9, No. 1, Hal. 11-22.
[9] Syarifuddin. Syukriah. Rini M J. Analisis Produktivitas Perusahaan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pospac Di
Pt. Supra Matra Abadi. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Industri. Hal. 278-287.
[10] Setiawan, B. Humiras H P. Hasbulah. 2021. Implementasi Metode Performance Prism pada Berbagai Bidang:
Kajian Literatur. Journal of Industrial and Engineering System. Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal. 40-55.
[11] Kinanti, W A. Nunung N. 2019. Usulan Perancangan Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dengan Konsep Green
HRM menggunakan Perspektif Performance Prism dan Metode AHP pada Waris Café. Jurnal Al-Azhar
Indonesia Seri Sains Dan Teknologi. Vol. 5, No. 2, Hal. 70-78.
[12] Novita, E. Edward M. Welly. 2021. Pengukuran Kinerja Dengan Metode Performance Prism Dan Omax (Studi
Kasus: Pt.X). Journal of Industrial and Quality Engineering. Vol. 9, No. 1, Hal. 49-61.
[13] Irsan, M. Silvia A M. Riri O. Report Key Performance Indicators for Employee Salaries at PT Mayora Indah
Tbk. Jurnal ULTIMA. Vol. 8, No. 1, Hal. 15-21.
[14] Astuti, M. Hana C W. Dwi N. Wahis Q. Andhika L W. 2018. Metode Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan.
(Dilengkapi Dengan Kinerja Lingkungan). Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.
[15] Azhar, Zulfi. 2020. Analisis Faktor Prioritas dalam Pemilihan Mata Kuliah Praktek pada Prodi Sistem
Informasi Menggunakan Metode AHP. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Digital Zone. Vol. 11, No. 1,
Hal. 120-129.
[16] Munthafa, Agnia Eva. Husni M. 2017. Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Sistem
Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jurnal Siliwangi. Vol. 3, No. 2, Hal. 192-201.
[17] Astari, Rizki Yulidh. Budi S G. Anton S. 2021. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Prioritas
Perbaikan Jalan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan
Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Langkat. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Kaputama (JSIK). Vol. 15, No. 1, Hal. 52-62.