Main Article Content
PT. VUB is engaged in construction manufacturing which is under the auspices of PT. Semen Indonesia Beton which will then be sent to retailers or distributors throughout Indonesia. The problem faced today is that companies often experience out of stock due to the fluctuating number of requests and inappropriate raw material planning that hampers the production process. This study aims to identify risky activity factors, plan appropriate strategies to minimize risk factors that occur in the company and provide solutions that can improve supply chain performance. The method used in supply chain risk mitigation at PT. VUB BM plant Pandaan is Fine-Kinney which aims to expose the value of risk factors based on the level of impact of the severity of the risk, and the solution uses the Anaytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method as a determinant of the weight of risk mitigation strategies in the supply chain. From the results of risk identification at PT. VUB BM Pandaan was found that the highest risk occurred in the variable lack of K3 implementation in the production process with a risk rating value of 420 which has a very high risk factor because it can cause work accidents to employees. And the results of risk analysis with the criteria of raw material suppliers, production processes and distributors using the AHP method obtained 7 alternative supply chain risk mitigation strategies. With this research, it is hoped that it can help companies to reduce the risk of the company's supply chain.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 Z. G. C. Netro, E. D. L. T. Romero, and J. L. M. Flores, “Adaptation of The Fine-Kinney Method in Supply Chain Risk Assessment,” in Safety and Security Engineering VII, Rome, Italy, 2018, vol. 174, pp. 43–55, doi: 10.2495/SAFE170051.
 T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2012.
 S. Usman, Manajemen Risiko dalam Industri, 1st ed. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2020.
 M. Oturakçı, C. Dağsuyu, and A. Kokangül, “A New Approach to Fine Kinney Method and an Implementation Study,” Alphanumeric Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2015.
 A. Kokangül, U. Polat, and C. Dağsuyu, “A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies,” Safety Science, vol. 91, pp. 24–32, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015.
 M. Gul, B. Guven, and A. F. Guneri, “A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 53, pp. 3–16, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.014.
 R. Ahmad, “Penggunaan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hirarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Menyeleksi Kelayakan Penerima Beasiswa,” METIK JURNAL, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–33, Jun. 2018.
 G. F. Kinney and A. D. Wiruth, “Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management,” NWC Technical Publication, California, 1976.
 R. B. Jakaria and W. Sulistiyowati, “Analysis of the decision on the fresh milkfish purchase by using Analytic Hierarchy Process method (AHP),” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 197, p. 14009, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819714009.