Literature Review: Pre-analytical Factors Influencing Clinical Laboratory Examination Results

Literatur Review: Faktor Pra-Analitik Yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Pemeriksaan Laboratorium klinik

Authors

  • Andika Aliviameita Program Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
  • Friska Ainun Nadhifah Program Studi D-IV Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
  • Achsanul Khitam Program Studi D-IV Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/pels.v10i1.2959

Keywords:

Pre-Analytical, Internal Quality Improvement, Clinical Laboratory, Laboratory Errors, Quality Control

Abstract

General Background The pre-analytical stage represents a critical phase within clinical laboratory testing sequences because it involves initial procedures largely reliant on manual handling and personnel precision. Specific Background Implementation of Internal Quality Improvement (IQI) serves as the primary evaluation tool to analyze pre-analytical factors affecting clinical laboratory test results. Knowledge Gap Although overall pre-analytical quality appears optimal, recurring human-factor errors during critical operational points remain inadequately mitigated across routine workflows. Aims This study evaluates pre-analytical variables influencing laboratory test accuracy and assesses the role of educational interventions in mitigating human-induced errors. Results Findings indicate that while internal quality performance generally ranges from good to very good, critical vulnerabilities persist during patient identification, phlebotomy execution, and anticoagulant-to-specimen volume ratios. Novelty This literature review synthesizes multi-year publication data from 2015 to 2015 to map recurrent pre-analytical discrepancies and evaluate targeted educational impacts. Implications Systematic staff education and standardized compliance significantly enhance procedural reliability and clinical diagnostic safety.

Key Findings Highlights

Pre-analytical error rates are predominantly driven by manual handling vulnerabilities during patient identification and sample collection,

Phlebotomy technique discrepancies and sample-to-anticoagulant ratio deviations significantly compromise test result accuracy,

Structured educational interventions effectively improve staff compliance and reduce human-factor errors.

Keywords Pre-Analytical, Internal Quality Improvement, Clinical Laboratory, Laboratory Errors, Quality Control

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. T. Siregar, W. S. Wulan, D. Setiawan, and A. Nuryati, Buku Ajar Kendali Mutu, 1st ed. 2018.

M. D. Sela, Bastian, and Aristoteles, “Analisis Jenis dan Frekuensi Kesalahan Tahap Pra-Analitik Pada Pemeriksaan Hematologi Rutin di Rumah Sakit,” vol. 2, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.37304/tropis.v2i2.19668.

S. E. Manik and Y. Haposan, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Flebotomi Pada Pemeriksaan Trombosit,” vol. 13, no. 1, 2021.

M. A. Yaqin and D. Arista, “Analisis Tahap Pemeriksaan Pra Analitik Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Hasil Laboratorium Di Rumah Sakit Muji Rahayu Surabaya,” vol. 5, no. 10, 2015.

Kurniawan, Bastian, and Aristoteles, “Analisa Pemantapan Mutu Internal Tahap Pra-Analitik Pemeriksaan Hematologi,” vol. 12, no. 2, 2024.

E. Khotimah, P. A. S. Lingga, and I. K. Pramitaningrum, “Tingkat Kualitas Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pra Analitik Pemeriksaan Hematologi,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2024.

Bastian, Amelia, and A. Natalia, “Edukasi Pemantapan Mutu Internal Tahap Pra-Analitik Pemeriksaan Hematologi Di RSU Bunda Palembang,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 169–175, 2025, doi: 10.59395/altifani.v5i2.669.

F. Anggraini, E. Khotimah, and S. S. Ningrum, “Analisis Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Di Laboratorium Rs Bhayangkara TK.I Raden Said Sukanto Tahun 2021,” vol. 4, no. April, pp. 24–30, 2022.

S. Nabilah, E. Khotimah, and I. K. Pramitaningrum, “Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pra-Analitik Pada Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Puasa Di Laboratorium Duren Sawit,” vol. 5, pp. 58–64, 2023.

Sari, “Edukasi Pengaruh Volume Sampel Darah pada Teknik Flebotomi terhadap Pemeriksaan Laboratorium,” vol. 5, no. April, pp. 116–123, 2023.

R. Wahyuningsih, “Analisis Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pemeriksaan Trombosit Di Instalasi Laboratorium Rsud Sultan Imanuddin Pangkalan BUN,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2017.

S. Maji, M. R. Kurniawan, and D. E. Putri, “Analisis Faktor – Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pada Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Di Laboratorium RSUD Budhi Asih,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–19, 2022.

D. P. Utama and R. Lestari, “Evaluasi Kepatuhan Prosedur Pra-Analitik dalam Menunjang Keselamatan Pasien di Instalasi Laboratorium Klinik,” Jurnal Keselamatan Pasien dan Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2024.

H. Prasetyo and N. Hidayah, “Analisis Variasi Penanganan Spesimen Darah Terhadap Akurasi Hasil Pemeriksaan Kimia Klinik,” Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2023.

S. Wibowo and T. Hartono, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Petugas Terhadap Reduksi Kesalahan Pra-Analitik di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah,” Jurnal Manajemen Kesehatan Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-16

How to Cite

[1]
“Literature Review: Pre-analytical Factors Influencing Clinical Laboratory Examination Results: Literatur Review: Faktor Pra-Analitik Yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Pemeriksaan Laboratorium klinik”, PELS, vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.21070/pels.v10i1.2959.