Analysis of the Accuracy of Diagnosis Codes Based on ICD-10 with the Application of the 4th Character at the Puskesmas of Semarang City


  • (1) * Munandziroh Munandziroh            Medical Record & Health Information STIKES HAKLI Semarang Semarang  
            Indonesia

  • (2)  Andri Asmorowati            Medical Record & Health Information STIKES HAKLI Semarang Semarang  
            Indonesia

  • (3)  Cahyono Rahadiyanto             Medical Record & Health Information STIKES HAKLI Semarang Semarang  
            Indonesia

  • (4)  Asih Prasetyowati            Medical Record & Health Information STIKES HAKLI Semarang Semarang  
            Indonesia

    (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The accuracy of the diagnosis code on the medical record document is used as a basis for making reports. If the diagnosis code is not properly coded then the resulting information will have low validation. The results of the initial survey at Puskesmas Genuk in the Top 10 of Disease in 2022, there are still many diagnosis codes that have not been coded until the 4th character. Objective is determine the accuracy analysis of disease diagnosis codes based on ICD-10 with the application of the 4th character of the fourth quarter at Puskesmas Genuk in 2022.This type of research is descriptive quantitative with a retrospective study approach. The primary data sources used are observation and interviews while the secondary data is from medical record data obtained from SIMPUS. The total population was 4,861 medical record data while the samples used were 98 with systematic random sampling techniques.Based on the results of research on 98 medical record data, the exact code is 21 (27.23%) while the incorrect code is 77 (72.77%). The inaccuracy of the diagnosis code is because the coding officer is not PMIK, the code is given only up to the 3rd character, there is no SOP for giving Disease Diagnosis Codes, not using ICD-10 but a list of SIMPUS codes. Conclusion are accuracy of the diagnosis code of 27.23% is much lower than the inaccuracy, coding officers from PMIK should be conducted, Training on Giving Disease / Action Coding, Diagnosis Codes at SIMPUS are given keys so that coders can choose a specific code, SIMPUS plus facilities for PMIK officers to validate coding after service

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] PERMENKES No. 43/MENKES/PER/2019 Tentang Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat. Jakarta.
[2] Nuryati, A E Pramono. (2013). Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Penyakit Berdasarkan ICD-10 Di Puskesmas Gondokusuman II Kota Yogyakarta Jurnal Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan Indonesia, ISSN,2337-585X.Vol.1 No. 1
[3] PERMENKES No. 24/MENKES/PER/2022 Tentang Rekam Medis.Jakarta.
[4] Anggraini Mayang, Irmawati, Dkk. (2017). Klasifikasi, Kodefikasi Penyakit Dan Masalah Terkait I : Anatomi, Fisiologi, Patologi, Terminologi Medis, Dan Tindakan Pada Sistem Kardiovaskuler, Respirasi, Dan Moskuloskeletal. PPSDMK: Jakarta
[5] Riska Adilah. (2020). Karya Tulis Ilmiah Literature Review Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Akurasi Kode Diagnosis Penyakit Dan Tindakan Rawat Jalan Di Puskesmas. Yayasan Perawat Sulawesi Selatan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Panakkukang. Prodi D3 Rekam Medis Dan Informasi Kesehatan
[6] Irmawati, I., & Nazillahtunnisa, N. (2019). Keakuratan kode diagnosis penyakit berdasarkan ICD-10 pada rekam medis rawat jalan di puskesmas. Jurnal Rekam Medis Dan Informasi Kesehatan, 2(2), 100-105.
[7] Nurrahmah, A., Rismaningsih, F., Si, S. P., Ul’fah Hernaeny, M. P., Pratiwi, L., Wahyudin, M. P., ... & Setiawan, J. (2021). Pengantar Statistika 1. Media Sains Indonesia: Bandung
[8] Swarjana, I. Ketut, and MPH SKM. (2022). Populasi-sampel, teknik sampling & bias dalam penelitian. Penerbit Andi: Yogyakarta
[9] Sugiarsi, Sri, Hosizah. (2018). Bahan Ajar Rekam Medis Dan Informasi Kesehatan (RMIK) Karya Tulis Ilmiah. BPPSDMK: Jakarta
[10] dr. Moch Onny P, dkk. (2023). Profile Kesehatan UPTD Puskesmas Genuk Tahun 2022. UPTD Puskesmas Genuk: Semarang.
[11] Ilmi, Laili Rahamatul (2018). Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis dengan ICD 10 di Puskesmas Pengasih I dan Pengasih II. Karanganyar: Jurnal Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan Indonesia.
[12] Soviana, Ayu (2021). Tinjauan tingkat keakuratan kode diagnosis typhoid fever pasien rawat inap berdasarkan ICD–10 di puskesmas guluk–guluk (Doctoral Dissertation, Stikes Ngudia Husada Madura).
[13] Nur Kamilatuz Zahrah Iskandar. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Penyakit Rawat Jalan di Puskesmas Gebang Kabupaten Cirebon().Polekkes Semarang:Prodi DIII Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan Semarang
[14] PERMENKES No. 312/MENKES/PER/2020 Tentang Standar Profesi Perekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan.Jakarta.
[15] Multisari, Septina, Sri Sugiarsi, and Nurifa’atul Masudah Awaliah. (2012). Analisis Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Utama Typhoid Fever Berdasarkan ICD-10 Pada Pasien Rawat Inap Di RSUD Kabupaten Sukoharjo Tahun 2011. Rekam Medis 6 (2):39.
[16] Mathar, Irmawati. (2018). Managemen Informasi Kesehatan Pengelolaan Rekam Medis. Deepublish: Yogyakarta
[17] Kasim, F. (2011). Sistem Klasifikasi Utama Morbiditas dan Mortalitas. Dalam Hatta, G, Editor. Pedoman Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan di Sarana Pelayanan Kesehatan. UI-Press: Jakarta
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image (License) or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published
2024-11-21
 
How to Cite
[1]
M. Munandziroh, A. Asmorowati, C. Rahadiyanto, and A. Prasetyowati, “Analysis of the Accuracy of Diagnosis Codes Based on ICD-10 with the Application of the 4th Character at the Puskesmas of Semarang City”, PELS, vol. 6, pp. 58 - 66, Nov. 2024.