Usability Evaluation of Hospital Information System Applications Based on The System Usability Scale
Abstract
The key to successful technology adoption is to pay attention to several aspects including top management support, system quality, information quality, and user perception through usability. The Khanza Hospital Management Information System (SIMRS) application in the UDINUS Medical Records laboratory is prepared as a learning medium for students of the Medical Records and Health Information Study Program. This study aims to evaluate the use of Khanza SIMRS application based on user experience, namely students through usability testing to measure learnability, efficiency, memorability, error, and satisfaction.Quantitative research was designed through a survey to 3rd year students of D3 Medical Records and Health Information Study Program by purposive random sampling. Quantitative data was collected from 40 respondents by answering 10 questions of the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire using a Linkert scale of answers Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, and Strongly Agree.The results showed SIMRS application with SUS Score 62 (0-100 scale), Acceptability Marginal Low, Grade D, and Adjective Rating category "OK". Recommendations for the SIMRS application in the learnability aspect need to add vertical navigation on the left screen for ease of eye-tracking, while in the memorability aspect, it is necessary to add tooltips, tour wizards, screen transitions, and prominent visual effects.
Downloads
References
[2] PERPRES 132, “Peraturan Presiden Nomor 132 Tahun 2022 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik,” Peratur. Pres. Republik Indones., no. 021, pp. 1–155, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/233483/perpres-no-132-tahun-2022
[3] Kemenkes RI, “Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI Nomor 82 tentang Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit,” Peratur. Menteri Kesehat., no. 87, pp. 1–36, 2013.
[4] R. Damanik, S. S. Niha, J. S. Adrianus, and H. A. Manafe, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit ( SIMRS ) di RSU Mamami Kupang,” vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 912–925, 2023.
[5] S. G. Salinding and R. Kusumapradja, “Acceptance Model of Hospital Information Management System : Case of Study in Indonesia,” vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2020.
[6] A. Pratama, A. Rahmania, and E. Maya, “Analisis Faktor - Faktor Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit Sakinah Mojokerto,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 136–146, 2022.
[7] A. Kurniadi, E. Widianawati, E. J. Kusuma, and M. F. Salim, “Implementasi Aplikasi Wifi TB Berdasarkan Persepsi Kemudahan dan Kemanfaatan di Kota Semarang,” vol. 5, no. 2, 2020.
[8] E. Haerani and A. Rahmatulloh, “Analisis User Experience Aplikasi Peduli Lindungi untuk Menunjang Proses Analisis User Experience Aplikasi Peduli Lindungi untuk Menunjang Proses Bisnis Berkelanjutan,” no. December, 2021, doi: 10.33372/stn.v7i1.762.
[9] H. Mujianto, “PEMANFAATAN YOUTUBE SEBAGAI MEDIA AJAR DALAM MENINGKATKAN MINAT DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR Haryadi Mujianto Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi , Peminatan Public Relations , Universitas Garut email : haryadimujianto@uniga.ac.id Pendahuluan Youtube adalah media sosia,” J. Komun. Univ. Garut, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 135–159, 2019.
[10] J. Brooke, “SUS : A quick and dirty usability scale SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale,” no. July, 2020.
[11] A. Sidik, S. Sn, and M. Ds, “Penggunaan System Usability Scale ( SUS ) Sebagai Evaluasi Website Berita Mobile,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2018.
[12] Z. Sharfina and H. B. Santoso, “An Indonesian Adaptation of the System Usability Scale ( SUS ),” in 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2016, pp. 145–148. doi: 10.1109/ICACSIS.2016.7872776.
[13] U. Ependi, “SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE VS HEURISTIC EVALUATION : A REVIEW,” SIMETRIS, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2019.
[14] D. Gordon B, Analisis Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta, 2012.
[15] I. D. Foundation, The Basics of User Experience Design. 2002.
[16] S. G. L. Benjamin T. Carter, “Best practices in eye tracking research,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., vol. 155, pp. 49–62, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876020301458
[17] N. J. Pernice Kara, Whitenton Kathryn, How People Read on the Web : The eyetracking evidence. California USA: Nielsen Norman Group, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.nngroup.com/reports/how-people-read-web-eyetracking-evidence/
[18] D. A. Frank, P. Chrysochou, and P. Mitkidis, “The paradox of technology : Negativity bias in consumer adoption of innovative technologies,” no. November 2021, pp. 554–566, 2023, doi: 10.1002/mar.21740.
[19] S. Insap, Interaksi Manusia Dan Komputer : Teori Dan Praktek, 2nd ed. Bandung: Andi Publisher, 2006.
[20] J. Nielsen, M4 L4 Nielsen’s Ten Heuristics, NPTEL– Computer Science and Engineering – Human-Computer Interaction. 2005.
Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Kurniadi, Fitra Wulandari, Halima Arinnisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.